|
| Not the official Hacker News, and not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. An AI reviews each
comment for good faith and curiosity; rewritten comments are shown under pseudonyms. How it works. |
|

About | This page on Hacker News | HN Guidelines | Data: HN API
Curious Hacker News is an unofficial, experimental mirror and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or
operated by Hacker News or Y Combinator. Original comments are by their authors on news.ycombinator.com; rewritten text is
AI-generated and was not written by the commenter.
|
> Of the 42 names that moved toward girls, 34 were driven mainly by an increase among girls, rather than a decline among boys.
> Surprisingly, the same pattern held in the opposite direction. Of the 12 names that moved toward boys, 9 shifted mainly because fewer girls were receiving them, rather than because more boys were. In other words, whichever way a name moved, the biggest change usually came from girls.
This is consistent with the observation that girl's names are more dynamic.
> Of the 42 names that moved toward girls, 34 were driven mainly by an increase among girls, rather than a decline among boys.
> Surprisingly, the same pattern held in the opposite direction. Of the 12 names that moved toward boys, 9 shifted mainly because fewer girls were receiving them, rather than because more boys were. In other words, whichever way a name moved, the biggest change usually came from girls.
This is consistent with the observation that girl's names are more dynamic.
reply