? Curious Hacker Newsfront | about | examples | prompts | view on HN unofficial mirror
Silicon Valley's Bad Night (theatlantic.com)
31 points by ent101 2026-11-06 | 5 comments | side by side | 0 rewritten | show 31 removed | updated 05:22 UTC
 help


gumby 2026-11-06 05:176/10questioninformative | next [–]

Why aren’t the dot centers bribing the locals with infrastructure? DC needs a GW of capacity? Build 3 GV, put 2 into the grid at low cost, build out transmission?

It used to be standard that companies would build infrastructure along with their plants. Cities all across the US Midwest were built this way.

Why aren’t the dot centers bribing the locals with infrastructure? DC needs a GW of capacity? Build 3 GV, put 2 into the grid at low cost, build out transmission?

It used to be standard that companies would build infrastructure along with their plants. Cities all across the US Midwest were built this way.

Substantive proposal with useful historical context on companies building infrastructure alongside plants.

[deleted]
hedora 2026-11-06 04:324/10ideologicalfirst_hand | prev | next [–]

I’m pro-AI. I use it all the time. I max out my $200 claude subscription and own a strix halo.

The data center buildout makes no sense.

I don’t want to work for a Trump lapdog, so MAGA++ recruiters can go pound sand.

I don’t think SV leadership realizes how f—-ked they are.

I’m pro-AI. I use it all the time. I max out my $200 claude subscription and own a strix halo.

The data center buildout makes no sense.

I don’t want to work for a Trump lapdog, so MAGA++ recruiters can go pound sand.

I don’t think SV leadership realizes how f—-ked they are.

Blunt but real position from a heavy AI user; its profanity and political disdain are aimed at leadership and institutions, not a commenter.

Not building out data centers would mean your $200 spend would be $500 no? Just supply/demand wise

Only in the MAGA world are we somehow given a choice between NDA-laden, Coal powered loud turbine data center projects or no data centers at all.

Feels like there’s always been an easy middle ground no? I agree nothing in the MAGA world has forced tech to pursue it, but it’s always been there.

Not building out data centers would mean your $200 spend would be $500 no? Just supply/demand wise

Only in the MAGA world are we somehow given a choice between NDA-laden, Coal powered loud turbine data center projects or no data centers at all.

Feels like there’s always been an easy middle ground no? I agree nothing in the MAGA world has forced tech to pursue it, but it’s always been there.

Makes a substantive supply/demand point and argues for a middle ground; opinionated but not aimed at a person.

Microsoft Amazon Google Apple to be clear.

Microsoft Amazon Google Apple to be clear.

Terse and wry, but the acronym reading makes a real point that big tech, not just politics, owns these choices.

I suspect they just got a wake-up call. In one night they lost a friendly congress by a LARGE margin, many local elections including Texas AG and Gov just walked out of their lives. Voters all over the country made their feelings on this issue clear enough that it would be difficult to pin this response on a party rather than the people as a whole.

All of this was preceded by the first economic shocks of the bubble bursting, and now it's truly underway. By this time next week it's entirely possible there will be fewer SV "Leaders" in a position to do more than wonder when exactly it all went so wrong.

Hint: It was the beginning.

I suspect they just got a wake-up call. In one night they lost a friendly congress by a LARGE margin, many local elections including Texas AG and Gov just walked out of their lives. Voters all over the country made their feelings on this issue clear enough that it would be difficult to pin this response on a party rather than the people as a whole.

All of this was preceded by the first economic shocks of the bubble bursting, and now it's truly underway. By this time next week it's entirely possible there will be fewer SV "Leaders" in a position to do more than wonder when exactly it all went so wrong.

Hint: It was the beginning.

Strongly opinionated but aimed at institutions and leaders, with a real argument about the election's implications for Silicon Valley.
stbenjam 2026-11-06 04:19 | removed0/10insinuationbad_faithlow_effortthread_removed | prev | next [–]

I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

A bare foreign-propaganda accusation has no point left without the insinuation, and the only reply mainly just rebuts it.
simonw 2026-11-06 05:21 | removed0/10insightful | parent | next [–]

I think it's a natural reaction to the "our AI systems are really dangerous and might kill you all and will definitely take your jobs" messages that have been coming out of the AI labs for the past few years.

They've dialed them back a bit now, but way too late. That message has sunk in.

Campaigning to prevent data centers from being built is the most actionable thing a US citizen can do, because it's a local issue (and hence something they can influence), plus they can use arguments about noise and power prices and water pollution to help make the case.

(I think most of those arguments don't stand up to scrutiny - as light industry goes data centers are pretty minor, would you prefer a concrete plant in your back yard? But I don't think the arguments are the point for a lot of people. It's about having a way to oppose AI generally.)

I think it's a natural reaction to the "our AI systems are really dangerous and might kill you all and will definitely take your jobs" messages that have been coming out of the AI labs for the past few years.

They've dialed them back a bit now, but way too late. That message has sunk in.

Campaigning to prevent data centers from being built is the most actionable thing a US citizen can do, because it's a local issue (and hence something they can influence), plus they can use arguments about noise and power prices and water pollution to help make the case.

(I think most of those arguments don't stand up to scrutiny - as light industry goes data centers are pretty minor, would you prefer a concrete plant in your back yard? But I don't think the arguments are the point for a lot of people. It's about having a way to oppose AI generally.)

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
AngryData 2026-11-06 04:55 | removed0/10ideological | parent | prev | next [–]

I don't see why I shouldn't be against them. It doesn't benefit me in any way, it just increases my electricity costs. Nor am I sure there is even a market for the majority of proposed data center builds, if this exponential growth/need for computing power doesn't hold we will be flushing money down the toilet, and largely on the public's dime since most of it is funded by loans and debt. Even if LLMs achieve all that is promised and more, that just means more people out of work sooner and the already powerful and wealthy gain more power and wealth than anybody else.

I don't see why I shouldn't be against them. It doesn't benefit me in any way, it just increases my electricity costs. Nor am I sure there is even a market for the majority of proposed data center builds, if this exponential growth/need for computing power doesn't hold we will be flushing money down the toilet, and largely on the public's dime since most of it is funded by loans and debt. Even if LLMs achieve all that is promised and more, that just means more people out of work sooner and the already powerful and wealthy gain more power and wealth than anybody else.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
RRWagner 2026-11-06 05:20 | removed0/10insightful | root | parent [–]

In some alternate universe, the AI companies could have used some of their billions to subsidize consumer accounts, or something, rather than just let 'supply and demand' raise the rates for all the people that they needed to not vote against them. why should anyone not directly benefitting from AI be charged more for their monthly keeping the lights on bill? The short-sightedness of the powerful never ceases to amaze me.

In some alternate universe, the AI companies could have used some of their billions to subsidize consumer accounts, or something, rather than just let 'supply and demand' raise the rates for all the people that they needed to not vote against them. why should anyone not directly benefitting from AI be charged more for their monthly keeping the lights on bill? The short-sightedness of the powerful never ceases to amaze me.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
arbitrary_name 2026-11-06 05:15 | removed0/10first_handideologicalinsightful | parent | prev | next [–]

i work in AI and i think we should hit the brakes: get a better oversight mechanism in place, help local municipalities get more in exchange for building them (no more tax incentives, NDAs, high emissions power sources), those are good places to start.

rushing ahead with the 'it might destroy us but we've gotta beat China!' is silly bullshit.

And the debt financing needs to stop.

There's a sensible path forward that doesn't involve a full stop, nor maintains the previous trajectory.

i work in AI and i think we should hit the brakes: get a better oversight mechanism in place, help local municipalities get more in exchange for building them (no more tax incentives, NDAs, high emissions power sources), those are good places to start.

rushing ahead with the 'it might destroy us but we've gotta beat China!' is silly bullshit.

And the debt financing needs to stop.

There's a sensible path forward that doesn't involve a full stop, nor maintains the previous trajectory.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.

I have no doubt there's foreign bot armies amplifying these things, but foreign bot armies understand they're most effective when the amplify real sentiments.

And the anti-data center stuff is a very, very real sentiment.

I have no doubt there's foreign bot armies amplifying these things, but foreign bot armies understand they're most effective when the amplify real sentiments.

And the anti-data center stuff is a very, very real sentiment.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
marcus_holmes 2026-11-06 04:23 | removed0/10first_hand | parent | prev | next [–]

I know actual people who are deeply opposed to AI (well, the current AI tech anyway), for what seem to them to be good moral reasons.

I find the attitude a bit weird and very left-wing purity-spiral stuff, but it is a real attitude that real people have.

I know actual people who are deeply opposed to AI (well, the current AI tech anyway), for what seem to them to be good moral reasons.

I find the attitude a bit weird and very left-wing purity-spiral stuff, but it is a real attitude that real people have.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
SubiculumCode 2026-11-06 04:36 | removed0/10insinuationideological | root | parent | next [–]

It's both. It's not either or. It's absolutely both.

There are good reasons for people to be pissed off about data centers in the U.S.

China is absolutely funneling money to push anti-datacenter sentiment, and many of the people involved/receiving that money are not aware of where that money came from.

We are at the crux of a national security spiral in AI development that is naturally unpopular at home.

It's both. It's not either or. It's absolutely both.

There are good reasons for people to be pissed off about data centers in the U.S.

China is absolutely funneling money to push anti-datacenter sentiment, and many of the people involved/receiving that money are not aware of where that money came from.

We are at the crux of a national security spiral in AI development that is naturally unpopular at home.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
EA-3167 2026-11-06 04:58 | removed0/10ideological | root | parent | next [–]

You know it's entirely possible for China to be pushing this while dropping their own fortune into research, and for everyone to lose their investments.

Don't get me wrong, it's no that the tech is useless, especially for militaries and surveillance states, but it's not the economic miracle or 'new industrial revolution' so many have gotten away with promoting. I think many here will be shocked at just how quickly a fad can die when the money implodes.

You know it's entirely possible for China to be pushing this while dropping their own fortune into research, and for everyone to lose their investments.

Don't get me wrong, it's no that the tech is useless, especially for militaries and surveillance states, but it's not the economic miracle or 'new industrial revolution' so many have gotten away with promoting. I think many here will be shocked at just how quickly a fad can die when the money implodes.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
mehlmao 2026-11-06 05:12 | removed0/10questionideological | root | parent | prev [–]

Who are the people receiving money from China to be opposed to the wasteful data center buildout, and how can I get some? I'm still waiting for my check from Russia / Iran / Qatar for being opposed to Israel's genocide campaign.

Who are the people receiving money from China to be opposed to the wasteful data center buildout, and how can I get some? I'm still waiting for my check from Russia / Iran / Qatar for being opposed to Israel's genocide campaign.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
someothherguyy 2026-11-06 04:33 | removed0/10question | root | parent | prev | next [–]

what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

it seems like a group of issues that the general public might be concerned about

what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

it seems like a group of issues that the general public might be concerned about

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
gruez 2026-11-06 04:36 | removed0/10informative | root | parent [–]

>what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

People trying to 1-up each other leading to the beliefs of a group being more polarized[1]. The naming doesn't imply it's a partisan phenomenon, any more than "right wing politician" implies politicians are a right wing phenomenon

[1] https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/

>what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

People trying to 1-up each other leading to the beliefs of a group being more polarized[1]. The naming doesn't imply it's a partisan phenomenon, any more than "right wing politician" implies politicians are a right wing phenomenon

[1] https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
someothherguyy 2026-11-06 04:37 | removed0/10question | root | parent [–]

i know what a purity spiral is. i was asking what this one is about and why the comment implied it is partisan

i know what a purity spiral is. i was asking what this one is about and why the comment implied it is partisan

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
gruez 2026-11-06 04:50 | removed0/10informative | root | parent [–]

The datacenter opposition is definitely partisan, even if you can find some overlap in supporters

https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260905_USC189.png

The datacenter opposition is definitely partisan, even if you can find some overlap in supporters

https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260905_USC189.png

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
esseph 2026-11-06 05:15 | removed0/10low_effort | root | parent | next [–]

[delayed]

[delayed]

Placeholder text with no content.
lubujackson 2026-11-06 05:14 | removed0/10ideological | root | parent | prev [–]

I would think that Elon Musk being Trump's lapdog while owning so much AI compute that he rents it out might have something to do with it.

I would think that Elon Musk being Trump's lapdog while owning so much AI compute that he rents it out might have something to do with it.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
darth_avocado 2026-11-06 05:04 | removed0/10question | root | parent | prev | next [–]

> for what seem to them to be good moral reasons

Like the desire to have a livelihood?

> for what seem to them to be good moral reasons

Like the desire to have a livelihood?

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
UncleOxidant 2026-11-06 05:20 | removed0/10ideological | root | parent [–]

And not wanting all knowledge and skills strip-mined and then sold back to us.

And not wanting all knowledge and skills strip-mined and then sold back to us.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
rsoto2 2026-11-06 05:10 | removed0/10ideological | root | parent | prev [–]

Yeah it's not like all these ai-tech oligarchs enabled trump to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars each and he proceeded to disenfranchise voters, kidnap minorities, and make a mockery of environmental protections. "left wing purity spiral stuff" people are watching community members without criminal records languish in work camps.

Yeah it's not like all these ai-tech oligarchs enabled trump to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars each and he proceeded to disenfranchise voters, kidnap minorities, and make a mockery of environmental protections. "left wing purity spiral stuff" people are watching community members without criminal records languish in work camps.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.

My neighbors take issue with people getting the wrong roof on their house. Not surprised people being against a data center nearby.

My neighbors take issue with people getting the wrong roof on their house. Not surprised people being against a data center nearby.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
happytoexplain 2026-11-06 05:12 | removed0/10question | root | parent | next [–]

What do those have to do with each other?

What do those have to do with each other?

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
mulderc 2026-11-06 05:18 | removed0/10low_effort | root | parent [–]

People are very NIMBY about these things.

People are very NIMBY about these things.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
darth_avocado 2026-11-06 05:10 | removed0/10informative | root | parent | prev [–]

Because they’re loud?

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuq/comments/1t7293k/this_is_the_sound_a_data_center_makes_around_the

Or could pollute the entire town’s water supply?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/08/us-datacenters-wastewater-pollution

Or air?

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/pollution-musks-unpermitted-xai-power-project-hits-hardest-black-communities-2026-07-14/

We’re going to pretend that these are the same concerns as an HOA squabble about wrong roofs? I like AI as a useful tool worth investing in but let’s not be dismissive about what people are actually mad about, because this dismissive attitude is exactly why SV finds itself where it is.

Because they’re loud?

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuq/comments/1t7293k/this_is_the_sound_a_data_center_makes_around_the

Or could pollute the entire town’s water supply?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/08/us-datacenters-wastewater-pollution

Or air?

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/pollution-musks-unpermitted-xai-power-project-hits-hardest-black-communities-2026-07-14/

We’re going to pretend that these are the same concerns as an HOA squabble about wrong roofs? I like AI as a useful tool worth investing in but let’s not be dismissive about what people are actually mad about, because this dismissive attitude is exactly why SV finds itself where it is.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.

I think we are on the same side. I’m saying people get angry about little things, no wonder they would get angry about even more serious issues.

I think we are on the same side. I’m saying people get angry about little things, no wonder they would get angry about even more serious issues.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
happytoexplain 2026-11-06 05:02 | removed0/10question | parent | prev | next [–]

Why...? Or is this just a sarcastic way of saying you disagree with the movement?

Why...? Or is this just a sarcastic way of saying you disagree with the movement?

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
10111001 2026-11-06 04:35 | removed0/10snark | parent | prev | next [–]

> I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

Exactly! No rational person could oppose supergeniuses like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Marc Andreessen, etc., so if people do, the logical conclusion is that they've been manipulated by a psyop.

Science is my superpower!

> I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

Exactly! No rational person could oppose supergeniuses like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Marc Andreessen, etc., so if people do, the logical conclusion is that they've been manipulated by a psyop.

Science is my superpower!

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
Dig1t 2026-11-06 04:33 | removed0/10first_hand | parent | prev | next [–]

My electricity bill is 50% higher than this same month 1 year ago. My friends and neighbors in my city have said that they also have greatly increased electricity bills. Whether or not that increase is due to a specific data center, it's extremely easy to blame it on the increased electricity usage of data centers, no foreign propaganda required.

My electricity bill is 50% higher than this same month 1 year ago. My friends and neighbors in my city have said that they also have greatly increased electricity bills. Whether or not that increase is due to a specific data center, it's extremely easy to blame it on the increased electricity usage of data centers, no foreign propaganda required.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
toast0 2026-11-06 04:56 | removed0/10first_handinformative | root | parent | next [–]

My electricity cost per kWh has just about doubled over the last 3 years, but afaik, it's mostly related to legislated changes to the energy mix and increases in fuel costs.

Fuel costs are up for lots of reasons, more demand for electricity could certainly be one of them... Inflation is certainly another component.

My electricity cost per kWh has just about doubled over the last 3 years, but afaik, it's mostly related to legislated changes to the energy mix and increases in fuel costs.

Fuel costs are up for lots of reasons, more demand for electricity could certainly be one of them... Inflation is certainly another component.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
AnthonyMouse 2026-11-06 05:04 | removed0/10insinuation | root | parent | prev [–]

If the problem is demand outstripping supply then the obvious thing to insist on is that if they want to build, they should add more supply than they're consuming, so that they're fronting the money to make your electric bills go down.

Whereas instead we keep seeing proposals to ban them outright, which is the thing you'd expect to be pushed by someone with a different interest than domestic electric bills.

If the problem is demand outstripping supply then the obvious thing to insist on is that if they want to build, they should add more supply than they're consuming, so that they're fronting the money to make your electric bills go down.

Whereas instead we keep seeing proposals to ban them outright, which is the thing you'd expect to be pushed by someone with a different interest than domestic electric bills.

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
UncleOxidant 2026-11-06 05:17 | removed0/10informative | root | parent [–]

> they should add more supply than they're consuming

In some places they're scavaging old jet engines and using them to generate electricity for data centers. Lots of noise, not very efficient - very bad idea. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/climate/jet-engines-ai-data-center-generators-boneyard.html

> they should add more supply than they're consuming

In some places they're scavaging old jet engines and using them to generate electricity for data centers. Lots of noise, not very efficient - very bad idea. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/climate/jet-engines-ai-data-center-generators-boneyard.html

Reply in a thread removed with its parent.
ares623 2026-11-06 04:31 | removed0/10jokesnarktrope | parent | prev [–]

it is woke mind virus propagated via 5g towers and vaccines

it is woke mind virus propagated via 5g towers and vaccines

One-line sarcastic meme mocking the parent, with no underlying point.

[deleted]



About | Details | Examples | Prompts | This page on Hacker News | HN Guidelines | Data: HN API

Curious Hacker News is an unofficial, experimental mirror and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by Hacker News or Y Combinator. Original comments are by their authors on news.ycombinator.com; rewritten text is AI-generated and was not written by the commenter.